Innovation in Family History

by melonakos on July 31, 2011

in Entrepreneurship,Family,Life,Religion,Startups

At a family gathering several years ago, I started brainstorming on ways to innovate in family history software. I was too busy to do anything with the ideas, but was excited about it nonetheless. My ideas were:

  • Family history should be more social.
  • Family history should be more scientific, based on hard evidence not consensus.
  • Family history should happen in the cloud.
  • Family history should be more Web 2.0 (or whatever the latest term is for a good-looking, user-friendly website).

For example, I should be able to login to the cloud, upload a scan of my great-great grandmother’s birth certificate, attach it to her record, and share this with whomever I wish. The same should be true for any other data, including photos, stories, anecdotes, etc.

Any aspect of a record’s data not verified by a scanned document should be marked, “Unverified.” Errors abound in family history records. Putting emphasis on original sources is the best way to clean it up.

PAF software circa 1997

In the late 1990s, I spent a lot of time with my nose buried in personal ancestral file (PAF) software, digitizing my parents and grandparents genealogical records. I grew an appreciation then for the massive amount of family history extraction work that has occurred over the years. It is phenomenal how much family history information is available.

I’ve not done much family history work in the last 10 years, consumed by school, family, and startups.  But I smiled recently when I saw the news that a new “stealth mode” startup, named youwho, raised $5 million to innovate in family history.

youwho SLC startup

I wish them luck. They’ll need it as they take on the 500-pound ancestry.com gorilla. They’ll also need it as they attempt to make family history more palatable for younger tech savvy segments, who aren’t naturally inclined to consume genealogy. Perhaps the youwho team will find this post and know that I’m “rooting” for them.

 

  • http://www.facebook.com/ken.atwell Ken Atwell

    I dug into my family history about five years ago and came to the same conclusion.  We should be working collaboratively, not reinventing the wheel and littering http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ with hundreds of identical sub-trees.

    I’m hoping for not only collaborative tree-building, but collaborative and open document access.  LDS has some of the right idea, by crowd-sourcing at https://www.familysearch.org/.  But it has a long way to go to be a viable alternative to the proprietary databases at ancestry.com.  I keep wishing the Google would step up and begin placing historical documents (census, tax roles, etc.) on-line as they have with Google Books (which, by the way, can be a good source if you happen to have ancestors of even minor distinction).  Electronic access to original documents (including the ability to upload new sources), collaborative annotation/mark-up of those documents, and collaborative (wiki-style?) single-truth tree creation would be the Holy Grail of genealogy.

    Best of luck to http://www.youwho.com/, I’ll be sure to keep my eye on them.

Previous post:

Next post: